EukaPay vs Confirmo: Crypto Payment Gateway Comparison
August 20, 2026

A merchant choosing a crypto payment gateway is usually choosing between two things:
the breadth of features they can use today, and the depth of automation they will need tomorrow.
EukaPay and Confirmo both let businesses accept stablecoins and crypto and settle in fiat.
The differences are in how granular the invoicing gets, what the API exposes, and how quickly a new merchant can move from sign-up to first transaction.
This guide compares EukaPay and Confirmo across the features that matter for businesses processing crypto in 2026.
If you are weighing the two, the tables below summarise the differences, and the sections after explain when each one actually fits.
Quick verdict
Confirmo is a crypto payment gateway authorized under the EU's MiCA framework via the Central Bank of Ireland.
It is an established choice for European merchants accepting BTC, ETH, USDC, USDT and other major assets.
EukaPay is built for businesses that want more control inside a single platform: granular invoice fields (line items, tax rules, discount codes), recurring billing, customer records, idempotent API requests, and instant account registration.
Both products do the basics; the difference shows up once a business needs to scale invoicing, automate billing, or integrate crypto into existing systems.
EukaPay prices each merchant on volume, use case and product mix, agreed with the EukaPay team during onboarding.
Payment products
Both gateways cover the core merchant tools: invoices, payment links, hosted checkout, refunds, payouts, and balance transfers.
Confirmo's recurring billing is more limited than EukaPay's full subscriptions product, which matters for SaaS, membership sites, and any business with repeat customers.
Feature | EukaPay | Confirmo |
Invoicing | Yes | Yes |
Subscriptions / recurring billing | Yes | Limited |
Checkout (hosted payment page) | Yes | Yes |
Payment links | Yes | Yes |
Crypto payouts / mass payouts | Yes | Yes |
Refunds | Yes | Yes |
Currency conversion / trades | Yes | Yes |
Balance management and transfers | Yes | Yes |
Platform and developer features
On the API side, the two diverge more visibly. EukaPay supports idempotent requests (using a unique key on retries to prevent duplicate invoices), structured customer records, and metadata fields on every transaction.
These are not edge cases. They are the features a developer needs once a payment system has to survive network failures, reconcile against an existing CRM, or carry order context through to settlement.
EukaPay also lets a business register and start exploring the dashboard instantly. Account verification is required before processing live transactions (as it is on any regulated platform), but developers can issue test keys and build against the sandbox immediately. Confirmo's onboarding requires verification before any account use.
Feature | EukaPay | Confirmo |
REST API | Yes | Yes |
Test environment | Yes | Yes |
Webhooks | Yes | Yes |
Idempotent requests | Yes | Limited |
Customer management | Yes | Limited |
Metadata / custom fields on records | Yes | Limited |
Instant registration | Yes | No |
Multi-currency invoicing | Yes | Limited |
Invoice capabilities
Invoicing is where the differences are most tangible for a finance team or a billing operator.
EukaPay supports multi-line invoices with per-item tax rules, discount codes applied at the invoice level, custom due and issue dates, and a configurable redirect URI that lets the merchant control the post-payment experience.
Confirmo handles the basics (line items, due dates, hosted payment URLs) but does not offer discount codes and provides only limited tax rule configuration.
For merchants doing simple flat-fee billing in a single tax jurisdiction, that is fine. For multi-region businesses, marketplaces, or any merchant running promotions, the EukaPay invoice model removes manual work.
Capability | EukaPay | Confirmo |
Line items on invoices | Yes | Yes |
Tax rules per invoice | Yes | Limited |
Discount codes per invoice | Yes | No |
Custom due dates and issue dates | Yes | Yes |
Redirect URI after payment | Yes | Basic |
Hosted payment URL | Yes | Yes |
Where the differences actually matter
For a SaaS company
EukaPay offers a dedicated subscription product that lets merchants charge customers on a recurring schedule through the dashboard and the API.
Confirmo's recurring billing is more constrained, which means SaaS-specific logic often ends up in the merchant's application code. For SaaS, membership platforms, or any business with predictable repeat charges, the difference matters.
For an e-commerce platform
Both will work. The deciding factor is invoice granularity and developer ergonomics: discount codes, per-line tax, idempotent retries on order webhooks, and metadata that travels with the transaction.
EukaPay covers all four. Confirmo covers the first one in limited form.
For a freelancer or consultant
If the use case is one-off client billing in BTC, ETH, or stablecoins, either gateway works.
EukaPay's Payment Links and Invoices both take under a minute to create and remove the friction of explaining wallet addresses to clients.
For an iGaming, forex, or high-volume operator
Volume changes the calculation. Mass payouts, programmatic invoice creation, and webhook reliability become the things that determine whether the integration scales.
EukaPay's API exposes the full surface of the dashboard, signs every webhook with an HMAC SHA-512 signature, retries failed deliveries for two hours, and supports idempotency keys on every POST.
These are not features merchants ask about until they are operating live and a network failure produces a duplicate invoice. They are the features that matter once volume is real.
Switching from Confirmo to EukaPay
Merchants migrating between gateways usually want to know three things: how long onboarding takes, what changes on the customer experience, and what their existing integrations need to do differently.
Onboarding:
EukaPay registration is instant. Business verification is required before processing live transactions, but the sandbox is available immediately so a developer can build the integration in parallel with verification.
Customer experience:
Customers pay through a hosted EukaPay checkout. The wallet flow is familiar to anyone who has paid with crypto before. Exchange rates are locked at the time of transaction, so customers see no volatility, and merchants receive the requested fiat amount.
Integration changes:
Migrating from Confirmo's API to EukaPay's involves swapping the authentication header, the invoice creation endpoint, and the webhook handler.
covers the equivalent endpoints, and the platform provides cURL and JavaScript samples for each.
Existing crypto balances on Confirmo can be withdrawn to a wallet and used to fund the EukaPay account, or settled to a bank account before the switch. There is no direct balance-transfer mechanism between gateways; that is true industry-wide.
Frequently asked questions
Is EukaPay regulated?
Yes. EukaPay is registered with FINTRAC (M22233887) as a Money Services Business in Canada.
Confirmo Limited is authorized under MiCA by the Central Bank of Ireland and operates across the EU. Both gateways apply KYC and AML procedures to merchant onboarding.
What cryptocurrencies does each support?
Both support BTC, ETH, LTC, USDC, USDT, and SOL across major networks.
EukaPay also supports payments on the Lightning Network for fast, low-fee Bitcoin transactions, and settles to your bank in USD, EUR, GBP, or CAD.
How does fiat settlement work?
Both gateways convert incoming crypto to fiat at the moment of transaction at a locked exchange rate, which removes volatility risk.
EukaPay settles to bank accounts in USD, EUR, GBP, and CAD. Confirmo settles in EUR and other supported fiat currencies through SEPA and similar rails.
Does either offer subscriptions or recurring billing?
EukaPay offers a dedicated subscription product that lets merchants charge customers on a recurring schedule through the dashboard and the API.
Confirmo's recurring billing is more limited. For SaaS, membership, or any business with predictable repeat charges, the EukaPay subscription product is a meaningful differentiator.
Can I run both gateways at the same time?
Yes. Many merchants run two gateways in parallel during a migration window, with different checkout flows routed to each.
Once the EukaPay integration is verified end-to-end against test transactions, the merchant can switch their production traffic.
Related articles
: the comparison most-asked since Coinbase Commerce announced its 2026 service changes.
Invoices, Payment Links, Checkouts, or API: which EukaPay product fits your business?
: the four products inside EukaPay and how to choose between them.
: full reference for developers building on the platform.
Get started with EukaPay
and explore the dashboard, or
to scope a specific use case.
Last updated: May 2026. Verify current pricing and feature availability with each provider.
Products
Use Cases
© 2026 EukaPay. All rights reserved.
FINTRAC: M22233887